-
Re: E-QSL
Mon, June 19, 2006 - 12:24 PMWell, how do you mean, "legal for contesting"? What were you planning to do?
It's not accepted for WAS, or any of the ARRL awards--for that, you'll have to go through/use the LOTW product, which some feel is a bit unwieldy and overly security-conscious. -
-
Re: E-QSL
Mon, June 19, 2006 - 1:45 PMI think you answered my question. I would like to work towards things like WAS. so the ARRL will not let people use them.
Why is that? also what is the LOTW?
Thanks
Mike -
-
Re: E-QSL
Tue, June 20, 2006 - 2:16 PMWhy don't they trust e-qsl? You have to go back to the 60's, and the days of Don Miller, and the inestimable Don Search, W3AZD, who spend much of his life at ARRL checking cards for forgeries.
So Jon Bloom of ARRL staff, and others, came up with the Logbook of the World concept, which I guess works, but there are a lot of people who don't like it or complain about it. You should be able to find info on it at the ARRL web site.
Personally? I think the supposed "importance" of the award programs such as DXCC has grown way out of hand to the point of obsessiveness. Surely, in the end, it's just a piece of paper. I have an entire wall full of contesting, DX, and other awards, and I'm sure that within a week of the day I die, they'll all be out on the curb with the garbage. Does it really matter to the extent that it does? -
-
Re: E-QSL
Tue, June 20, 2006 - 4:12 PMGood Point! I will look in to it more. Thanks
-
-
-
Recent topics in "ham radio"
| Topic | Author | Replies | Last Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost estimate for initial set up? |
|
5 | June 8, 2008 |
| Introduction... |
|
8 | April 27, 2008 |
| PACKET |
|
2 | March 6, 2008 |
| Kenwood Support |
|
0 | January 5, 2008 |